Rarely Seen 19th-Century Silhouette of a Same-Sex Couple Living Together Goes On View

Among the dozens of works on display in a new show at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery is one that is possibly the first depiction of a same sex couple—the silhouettes of Sylvia Drake and Charity Bryant of Weybridge, Vermont, entwined in braided human hair that is also shaped into a heart.

“Can you imagine an oil painting of these two women from that era” asks Asma Naeem, the National Portrait Gallery curator of prints, drawings and media arts, who curated the new show Black Out: Silhouettes Then and Now and authored its catalog.

William Cullen Bryant, Charity’s nephew, wrote in 1843 of their relationship: “If I were permitted to draw aside the veil of private life, I would briefly give you the singular, and to me most interesting history of two maiden ladies who dwell in this valley. I would tell you how, in their youthful days, they took each other as companions for life, and how this union, no less sacred to them than the tie of marriage, has subsisted, in uninterrupted harmony for more than forty years. . . but I have already said more than they will forgive me.”

“Silhouettes allowed these kinds of stories to be told,” says Naeem. “It’s important to note that people of all backgrounds, of all sexual orientation, have been in this country from the very beginning. That allows us to tell that story.”

The bold new show about an old art form looks at its complex historical, political and sociological underpinnings. It is not only the first major museum exhibition to explore the popular art form of cut paper profiles, but the show also digs deeper into how quick and inexpensive process that offered “virtually instantaneous likenesses to everyone from presidents to the enslaved,” says the museum’s director Kim Sajet.

A bill of sale for an enslaved woman, the 19-year-old Flora, 1796 (Stratford Historical Society, Stratford, CT)

Silhouette of the 19-year-old enslaved woman, Flora, 1796 (Stratford Historical Society, Stratford, CT)

Indeed, a huge ledger containing the work of silhouette cutter William Bache, a collection of 1,846 profiles, begins with the side views of George and Martha Washington but also includes a wide swath of people from all socioeconomic status that Bache cut while working in his studio in New Orleans.

Like other recent exhibitions at the Portrait Gallery as it marks its 50th anniversary, Black Out emphasizes the “social underpinnings, drawing attention to those who have been previously blacked out from history such as the enslaved, working women, same sex couples and those with disabilities,” says Sajet.

The addition of innovative contemporary work by four women artists, including one completed the night before the show’s press preview, contrast with the oldest work in the show, which dates to 1796 and is the most harrowing. It is the tremulous outline of an enslaved 19-year-old named Flora whose portrait was found alongside her original bill of sale in Connecticut for 25 pounds silver.

Lent from the Stratford Historical Society in Connecticut, Flora is “one of the very few tangible portraits that still exists of someone who was literally made a slave in America in the 18th century,” Sajet says.

“As you know, the Portrait Gallery is a place where people come to see luminaries, people come to see people who have made a significant contribution to American history and culture. But that doesn’t tell the whole American story in my view,” says Naeem. Fascinated with silhouettes as a young girl, the curator says she was delighted to find when coming to the Portrait Gallery in 2014 that the museum has “one of the most extensive collections of silhouettes in the country.”

If nothing else, the show emphasizes that it was the lowly silhouette, which nearly every family could afford to put on their wall, that democratized portraiture in America—not photography, which wasn’t invented until 1839 and didn’t become accessible for wide use until the later 19th century.

“Silhouettes have been around much longer than that,” Naeem says, going back to the 1680s when royalty offered their profile for posterity.

Auguste Edouart Self-Portrait by Auguste Edouart, 1843 (NPG, gift of Mrs. Tyson Lee)

Laura Dewey Bridgman by Auguste Edouart, 1843 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

Mary Phelps Austin Holley by Auguste Edouart, 1844 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

Lydia Maria Francis Child by Auguste Edouart, 1841 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

Emma Catherine Embury by Auguste Edouart, 1839 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

John Quincy Adams by Auguste Edouart, 1841 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

Titian and Rembrandt Peale by Auguste Edouart, 1842 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

Thomas Sully by Auguste Edouart, 1843 (NPG, gift of Robert L. McNeil, Jr.)

Mr. Shaw’s Blackman by Moses Williams, after 1802 (The Library Company of Philadelphia)

Interest in the cutouts grew with the rise of the pseudoscience of physiognomy that claimed that a person’s moral character could be discerned, Naeem says, “simply by the shape of your forehead, the bump on your nose or how your chin related to the rest of your face.”

“All of a sudden, this beautiful art form became annexed with this pseudoscientific field. And very quickly people wanted to know what their profile showed,” Naeem says. “The term racial profiling really gets its origins from silhouettes,” she says. “It’s the idea that people who look a certain way act a certain way, based on this pseudoscientific field of physiognomy.”

What also made silhouettes a rage, with hundreds of thousands made in America in the first decade of the 1800s, was just how inexpensive it was. “It was dirt cheap that someone from any walk of life could access,” Naeem says. “Instead of an oil on canvas portrait which would cost anywhere upwards of $ 100 in the early 1800s, four silhouettes cost 25 cents.”

To look back at what was created now is to see, yes, ex-presidents like John Quincy Adams, depicted in a full-sized 1841 profile by Auguste Edouard, the year after Adams argued the Amistad case, but also merchants, soldiers and the enslaved. In a nation seemingly consumed in race, silhouettes erased that distinction, rendering everyone in the same black outline.

Though the heyday of silhouettes may have passed, some of its aspects continue. On social media, the word “profile” refers to what needs to be completed with a picture of oneself and a blank silhouette is a placeholder.

Profile by Kumi Yamashita, 1994 (Ryo Sekimura)

Origami by Kumi Yamashita, 2015 (Mitch Ranger)

Auntie Walker’s Wall Sampler for Civilians by Kara Walker, 2013 (© Kara Walker, courtesy of Sikkema Jenkins & Co., New York. ” Camden Arts Centre, London, 2013. Photo: Angus Mill Photography)

Auntie Walker’s Wall Sampler for Savages by Kara Walker, 2013 (© Kara Walker, courtesy of Sikkema Jenkins & Co., New York. ” Camden Arts Centre, London, 2013. Photo: Angus Mill Photography)

Maibaum by Kristi Malakoff, 2009 (Kristi Malakoff)

Chair by Kumi Yamashita, 2015 (Hiroshi Noguchi)

Burning African Village Play Set with Big House and Lynching by Kara Walker, 2006 (© Kara Walker, courtesy of Sikkema Jenkins & Co., New York. Photo: Luciano Fileti)

Precarious by Camille Utterback, 2018 (Brett Bowman, 2018)

The use of silhouette in contemporary art has been most strongly associated with Kara Walker, whose vivid works of Civil War-era mayhem are spread along two walls, surrounding her table top Burning African Village Play Set with Big House and Lynching.

More serene is the 18-foot-tall, three-dimensional life-sized maypole with the silhouette-rendered figures of 20 children in fancy Victorian clothes by the Canadian artist Kristi Malakoff, further festooned with black ribbon and the cutouts of 50 birds flying above.

Another room brings back the interactive work of artist Camille Utterback, who was previously in the building with her Text Rain as part of the Smithsonian American Art Museum’s Watch This! exhibition three years ago. Invited to take part in another Smithsonian show in which patrons interact with a video screen and leave their own silhouette (albeit one taken by a camera in the ceiling that almost instantly becomes one of the work’s abstractions).

“Photography gives us this mistaken idea that you can hold onto a moment in a precise way,” says Utterback, a MacArthur fellow who teaches at Stamford. In her Precarious (the one receiving last minute adjustments the night before), “you’re creating an evolving system. It’s always in a state of flux.”

The final contemporary artist, Kumi Yamashita, a finalist in the Portrait Gallery’s 2013 Outwin Boochever Portrait Competition, is doing the opposite of silhouette cutters.

Rather than capture a shadow, she is creating them. What looks to be 16 sheets of gently ruffled colored paper on one wall, lit from the side, turns out to be shadows of specific profiles (one is of the curator Naeem).

On another wall, the eye is drawn to the jumble of letters and numbers lit from the side, only to see, eventually, the singular large human profile they create. Finally, what looks to be a slim, carved piece of plastic casts the shadow of a woman sitting on a chair.

“Many people think there’s a projection somewhere that is making that woman sit on the chair,” Naeem says, but it’s just the shadow from a single light source.

“It’s so simple people are trying to make it more complicated,” Yamashita says.

“Black Out: Silhouettes Then and Now” continues at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C. through March 10, 2019.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


Arts & Culture | Smithsonian

Innocent Couple Raided by Cops for Facebook Post of LEGAL Morel Mushrooms

Darlington, MD — It is a travesty enough when the drug war lays waste to the rights and lives of entirely decent people who’ve harmed no one simply because they choose to ingest a substance deemed illegal by the state. However, because the drug war is such an immoral and barbaric practice, entirely innocent people are also swept up in the dragnet of tyranny and ignorance. Case in point: a couple in Maryland were raided by cops for posting photos of legal morel mushrooms they picked and ate.

On Friday, John Garrison and his girlfriend Hope went foraging the mountains for some morel mushrooms. Morels are known to those in the region as being the safest mushroom to hunt for as they are very easily identified due to their unique look. From mid April to mid May, lovers of nature and good food, like John and Hope will find them growing near trees or where there used to be trees.

Garrison was so excited that they had found a bunch of them, that he posted a photo on Facebook of he and Hope’s bounty along with his plans to “sautee them with brown sugar and cinnamon and see how that turns out.”

mushrooms

A great night of good food was set to follow an awesome day of hiking and foraging. That is, however, until the wheels of the police state drug war caught a whiff of the mushrooms.

Garrison made the post that they were about to saute the mushrooms at 9:09 pm. Only hours later as he and Hope sat back with full bellies, police showed up.

“We had just finished eating the Morels we found today and heard a knock on the door. A police officer and an RA were standing outside. We let them in and as soon as the police officer walked in he asked us why we were eating mushrooms and posting about it online. He thought he was on the biggest bust of his career thinking we were having a magic mushroom party before I explained to him that Morels are a native choice edible mushroom similar to truffles,” explained Garrison.

However, this cop—clearly unaware of the tasty morel and hell bent on busting kids for eating mushrooms—just knew he had caught himself a pair of hardened criminals who’d dare to expand their consciousness in the sanctity of their own home.

“He wasn’t convinced. So I rummaged through the trash to find a peice (sic) of a Morel so that he would have evidence that we weren’t taking psychedelic mushrooms. I showed him and he still wasn’t convinced that they weren’t magic mushrooms, Which was shocking to me because morels look nothing like a psychedelic psilocybin (sic) mushrooms and I figured a police officer would know what illegal drugs looked like. A second police officer showed up and I showed her the Morel and she immediately knew it was a Morel which was a relief. They processed our ID’s and eventually left. What an experience,” Garrison wrote on Facebook.

Indeed, it was a troublesome experience and, had anything made police fear for their lives during this interaction, things could have turned out a lot worse.

Equally as troubling as cops raiding your apartment over Facebook posts for legal mushrooms is how they found out about it in the first place. Were police simply trolling Facebook that night and saw Garrison’s post? Or, did some “good citizen” do their due diligence and “see something and say something”?

Either way, both of those scenarios are undesirable and facilitated by the state’s immoral and violent drug war. Until the dinosaurs in the prison industrial complex—who keep the drug war alive to reap massive profits off of persecuting people for victimless crimes—are exposed, this madness will continue and others will not be as luck as John and Hope.

DASH cryptocurrency and The Free Thought Project have formed a partnership that will continue to spread the ideas of peace and freedom while simultaneously teaching people how to operate outside of the establishment systems of control like using cryptocurrency instead of dollars. Winning this battle is as simple as choosing to abstain from the violent corrupt old system and participating in the new and peaceful system that hands the power back to the people. DASH is this system.

DASH digital cash takes the control the banking elite has over money and gives it back to the people. It is the ultimate weapon in the battle against the money changers and information controllers.

If you’d like to start your own DASH wallet and be a part of this change and battle for peace and freedom, you can start right here. DASH is already accepted by vendors all across the world so you can begin using it immediately.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

The Free Thought Project

Happy Couple Embarrassed to Admit They Met Offline|Humor

image for Happy Couple Embarrassed to Admit They Met Offline
Jason and Carolyn are living proof that love can happen in mysterious ways – even offline.

Sickeningly-sweet New York City couple, Jason Morley and Carolyn Shea, recently – and reluctantly – revealed to their friends that they met offline, rather than through an online dating site.

“We actually met waiting in line at a coffee shop,” said Carolyn. “Which seems so lame! But it’s the truth.”

“So I guess in sense we could claim we met on line!” noted Jason, with a playful poke to Carolyn’s side.

“Ha!” she said. “You’re right.”

Jason confessed that he’d been telling his male buddies that he and Carolyn, who have now been dating seriously for almost three months, met on “some random dating site” but that he couldn’t remember which one. He said that that response met with approval from his site-hopping friends, who enjoy maintaining multiple profiles on various dating apps.

Carolyn, on the other hand, had been telling her girlfriends that she and Jason met through the online dating website MeetMindful. “It seemed a little classier and kind of outside-the-box, but in a good way,” explained Carolyn. “Plus none of them were on there, so I knew they wouldn’t be able to double-check my story.”

Her friends did occasionally question why she and/or Jason, neither of whom had ever expressed any interest in mindfulness, meditation, or Buddhism, would join such a site. Carolyn says that in response, she would tell them that she signed up on a whim, when she was drunk.

Ultimately, though, Jason and Carolyn grew tired of misrepresenting their “how we met” story.

“It was just too much work to keep up the facade,” says Carolyn. “And we realized that these people were our friends – they’d understand. And they did. First we told them in person, and that didn’t go so well. But once we posted the information on Facebook, people actually liked the story. Officially.”

“We’re different,” concluded Jason. “And that’s okay.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

TheSpoof.com : Spoof News : Front Page